RUSSIAN NUKE TRACED TO TEXAS

[Miles]

No confirmation for this story, and it is based on "reverse speech." I have
no knowledge of "reverse speech" nor can I find any confirmation for this
story. But it is interesting, and if you go to the web site you can hear a
tape of the reverse speech. Sorcha Faal is a bit weird, but does cite
sources for her articles. Ken Welch is a poor imitation, but may have
something here. At any rate, we will know in a few weeks if "reverse
speech" is accurate and dependable...and if Ken Welch actually has something
here or is ready for a sleeveless shirt in a rubber room. This is a small
web site on a small server, it had exceeded its bandwidth all night, so this
story is getting a lot of attention.
Miles
--------------------------


RUSSIAN NUKE TRACED TO TEXAS
KEN-WELCH.COM
by Ken Welch in Houston Posted March 25, 2006

During the summer of 2005 it was decided go ahead with plans for America's
second 9/11.

The decision was not made in a torch-lit cave in Afghanistan, nor in a
nondescript safe-house in Iraq. Implementing the plan would involve the
highest officials of the United States government. The centerpiece of the
plan is a portable nuclear weapon manufactured in the former Soviet Union. A
tame "terrorist", destined no doubt to be an eventual patsy, arranged for
the bomb's transport by sea, and the ship carrying it entered Galveston Bay
on January 25, 2006. At this time the device remains hidden on board the
ship that brought it, a freighter docked in or near the port of Texas City,
about thirty minutes south of Houston, and only ten miles from the island
city of Galveston.

Radiation monitoring teams from the Department of Homeland Security were on
the beach at Galveston to make sure there was no radiation leakage from the
ship that might register on monitors and give away the secret. After the
vessel concluded it's normal business and was tied up at its final position,
a team of experts inspected the device, determined that it was fully
functional, and installed the triggering mechanism. They pronounced it ready
to go, and released it to the White House on February 16th.

The nuke has remained there up to the time of this posting, and will be
detonated at some time during the Easter holiday, April 14-16, to maximize
the illusion that the world is involved in religious conflict. This will be
a spectacular media event involving the mass evacuation of three million
people, already tested in the bizarre Rita stampede last November. Network
cameras will be locked on Texas City, from a distance of course, to ensure
the best possible pictures of the flash and rising mushroom cloud. Many
Americans will die, and the once again the world will be changed forever.

This is ultimate reality, life in the raw, far removed from the fairytales
taught in schools and portrayed in mass media. It simply doesn't get more
real than this. Within this report you will hear the voices of U. S.
officials in reversed speech, a medium that reveals hidden thoughts, giving
you the actual details about their little mushroom surprise for America and
the world.

You will hear with your own ears WHAT it is, WHERE it is, HOW it got here,
WHO is responsible, and WHEN they intend to set it off.

Perhaps, if you share this report with enough people, the plan will be
changed. The nuke can be quietly recovered and they will take it somewhere
else. However, events over the past decade clearly demonstrate that those
who are calling the shots firmly believe that their control and corruption
of the government and military is so complete that the American people are
totally powerless. It simply doesn't matter how many people are aware of
what is really happening. There is nothing they can do about it.

I. January: Rumors Of A Nuke

On January 25th, 2006, the same day that we now know the nuke actually
arrived, journalist Greg Szymanski posted on his ArcticBeacon. com a story
titled, "All Signposts Lead To Imminent Nuclear Attack In America". The
story was mirrored the following day on Rense. com, where my eye was
naturally attracted to the subtitle, which read: "Intel Army Capt. Eric May
Issues 'Red Alert' For Next 9 Days For Texas City-Houston Area".

That's where I live. Now, truth be told, Houston is a city that has
virtually no detectable character and I doubt that the world would miss it.
On the other hand there are a lot of people in Houston, some of whom I
rather like.

Szymanski wrote:

The January air is again filled with rumblings about an imminent nuclear
attack on American soil, as ominous signs are popping up all over the place
indicating the "dropping of the real potato" is right around the corner.
Sources inside the military and close to the action this week warned areas
of "nuclear concern" within the next 10 to 90 days include Texas City, Tex.,
the Houston metro area, Charleston, S. C., Los Angeles, Ca., and Kansas
City, Ka.

Szymanski's source, a Captain May, claims to have deciphered the secret code
of special dates that determines when the bad guys stage their big stunts,
and also to have friends in Army intelligence circles who were leaking
information about a nuke. Websites related to May are basically
incomprehensible. However, the references to "military sources" naming
various cities had all the earmarks of a long series of internet Psyops
designed to prepare the public for a nuclear event.

If you don't understand this, pause for a moment and think. Why would people
leak this? If they are really looking for a nuke, then they will be out
there looking. What would be the point of blabbing about it? Sure, leaks
happen, and often for very courageous reasons. But with no way to narrow
down the location there is really nothing to leak. On the other hand, if you
are trying to build a psychological framework to support a future event, or
to distract people from some other program or event, then leak away - it's
just one more tool in the propagandist's toolbox.

Szymanski posted a follow up article a day later, this one also driven by
information from Capt. May who claimed sources inside the Houston Police
Department had confirmed that in recent weeks they had been taking part in
nuclear disaster drills. I have no idea if this is true. The Arctic Beacon,
however, listed this as one more piece of evidence that the city was being
targeted by the Bush administration for a nuclear attack. A third article on
January 28th and a fourth on February 3rd completed the coverage, noting at
the end that there was in fact a training exercise for homeland security WMD
teams in Galveston that week, with monitoring equipment set up on the beach.
It was reported in a local newspaper.

On February 4th, the blog "Christian Partners For Peace" jumped in with an
article titled, "Whose Nuke is Coming to the US?" This piece referenced
"intelligence sources" who now were hinting that the mystery nuke had been
smuggled through the newly discovered Mexican drug tunnel. The article
pointed out how unlikely this theory was, and echoed my own conclusion:
there really was a nuke and the anonymous "sources" were simply laying the
psychological foundation. This is a very common tactic which serves two
purposes.

First, when people are prepared for a big event over time, then when it
actually happens their first thoughts are, "I just knew this was going to
happen!" It's like being told for several years before 9/11 that terrorists
would sooner or later come to America.

This ensures that people are much more likely to accept the official story
of what happened, because key parts of it are already lodged in the back of
their mind. They whole story seems much more reasonable than it would if it
were sprung on them all at once. Second, the voices that are sounding the
"warning" gain in credibility afterward, and their value as a propaganda
tool is enhanced. People will pay much more attention next time.

One thing in the back of MY mind as I read each story in turn: Houston has
already experienced a bizarre, pointless, and distinctly surreal evacuation
of nearly three million people in connection with hurricane Rita, only a few
months before. If the mystery nuke turns into a media circus so the whole
world gets to watch like they did on 9/11, then all the kinks and problems
that will arise as the population panics have already been mapped out from
an exceptionally convenient test. What a coincidence.

II. Second week of February: The Hunt Begins

Although I was immediately suspicious of the nuke stories, it took four days
of an increasing feeling of "wrongness" before I realized that I was going
to have to do something. To find out quickly if there were grounds for my
suspicions, I went to the website of the "World Economic Forum", an
organization that meets annually in Davos, Switzerland. While others have
their favorite "illuminati" organizations, my money says these folks, and
the multinational corporations they represent, are the guys that are deeply
involved in making things happen. They have a great public image, but
reversed speech has shown they know way too much about the really nasty
stuff to be mere observers. They brief each other in private, and then
babble about it unconsciously when the microphones are on.

On the 26th of January, U. S. Secretary of State Dr. Condoleezza Rice
addressed the annual W. E. F. meeting via a video hook-up, presumably from
Washington. The program was still available for viewing so I recorded the
audio and went to work. I hit pay dirt almost immediately. Condi blabbed
about the nuke.

Click on the sound button below to hear the results, with a brief narrative
that describes the process and format being used.

[Intergator]

Could be you meant to post this in ALT or Unexplained?